Skip to content

NYC Takes a Stand: The Algorithmic Accountability Act and the Fight Against Bias

New York City, also known as the Big Apple, is famous for its busy streets and famous buildings. It’s also taking the lead in addressing algorithmic bias. In 2021, New York City became the first city in the world to require bias audits for certain automated decision-systems that affect city services. The Algorithmic Accountability Act is important law designed to make sure that systems deciding who gets housing, jobs, healthcare, and other essential services are fair for everyone.

Why did this need to happen? The answer is about the possible risks of bias in algorithms that are not controlled.

The Dangers of Unconscious Bias in Automated Choices

At their core, algorithms are math methods that learn from large sets of data. These datasets often show the biases that present in society, whether people are aware of them or not. This means that algorithms, even though they seem neutral, can continue and even increase these biases, resulting in unfair results.

Consider, for example, an algorithm used to rate loan applications. If the training data mostly includes white people with high credit scores, the algorithm could unfairly hurt applications who are people of colour or have lower credit scores, even if their financial situations are good.

These unfair results can deeply harm both people and societies. They can make current inequalities worse, reduce chances, and weaken trust in government.

Dealing with the NYC Bias Audit Requirement

The NYC bias audit rule is an important step to reduce these risks. Companies that create or use automatic decision systems for city services must carry out independent checks to look for any possible bias. These audits should look at the data used to train the programs, how decisions are made, and how different groups of people might be affected.

The law doesn’t just seek to find bias; it also requires companies to take real actions to reduce it. This could mean changing the training data, altering how the program is set up, or adding people to help keep an eye on things.

Advantages of the NYC Bias Audit Requirement

This new law has many benefits:

More Openness and Responsibility: By making audit results public, the rule encourages openness and holds people accountable. It requires companies to acknowledge any flaws in their systems and urges them to be more transparent about how they make decisions.

The NYC bias audit aims to reduce discrimination by finding and addressing bias, making the city better and more equal for everyone. This is especially important for marginalised groups that are more negatively affected by unfair algorithms.

Building Public believe: Showing that we are fair and responsible with technology can help people believe government institutions again and create a more inclusive society.

The NYC bias audit rule can be a guide for other places, helping them create better practices and encourage fairness in algorithms.

Challenges and Future Plans

The NYC bias audit requirement is an important move, but we should recognise the difficulties that still lie ahead.

Defining and Measuring Bias: Bias can appear in small and complicated ways, which makes it hard to describe and measure correctly. We need to keep researching and improving ways to find and reduce bias in programs.

Resource Needs: Doing thorough bias checks takes a lot of resources and requires special skills and technical know-how.

It’s important to give enough resources and support to businesses, especially smaller ones, to help them successfully follow the new requirements.

Enforcement and Impact: How well the NYC bias audit rule works will rely on strong enforcement and regular tracking. It’s important to make sure companies follow the rules and that checks help make algorithms fairer.